Tumor-suppressor p53 is expressed in proliferating and newly formed neurons of the embryonic and postnatal rat brain: Comparison with expression of the cell cycle regulators p21Waf1/Cip1, p27Kip1, p57Kip2, p16Ink4a, cyclin G1, and the proto-oncogene bax

Author(s):  
Menno Van Lookeren Campagne ◽  
Ramanjit Gill
2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 556-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangcheng Tang ◽  
Zhigang Chen ◽  
Mi Deng ◽  
Ling Wang ◽  
Qian Nie ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Ellen Perry ◽  
Arnold J. Levine

Oncogene ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (24) ◽  
pp. 3114-3124 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Palazzo ◽  
M Kellett ◽  
C Cataisson ◽  
A Gormley ◽  
P W Bible ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 302-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen J. Smith ◽  
Terry L. Barrett ◽  
William F. Smith ◽  
Henry M. Skelton

2017 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-81
Author(s):  
Qian Xu ◽  
Dong-zhi Yuan ◽  
Sheng Zhang ◽  
Ting Qu ◽  
Shi-mao Zhang ◽  
...  

Uterine stromal cell decidualization is a dynamic physiological process in which cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis are orchestrated and occur in a temporal and cell-specific manner. This process is important for successful embryo implantation. Many cell-cycle regulators are involved in decidualization. The protein cyclin G1 is a unique regulator of the cell cycle with dual functions in cell proliferation. It was reported that cyclin G1 is expressed in mouse uterine stromal cells during the period of peri-implantation. To prove the function of cyclin G1 in mouse uterine stromal cells during this period, immunohistochemistry was used to stain mouse uterine tissues on days 4-8 of pregnancy. The results showed obvious spatial and temporal expression of cyclin G1 in uterine stromal cells, and that it is expressed in the cells of the primary decidual zone (PDZ) on day 5 and secondary decidual zone (SDZ) on days 6 and 7, when the stromal cells experienced active proliferation and differentiation was initiated. Applying the decidualization model of cultured primary stromal cells in vitro, we further revealed that the expression of cyclin G1 is associated with decidualization of stromal cells induced by medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and estradiol-17? (E2). RNA interference was used for the knockdown of cyclin G1 in the induced decidual cells. Flow cytometry analysis indicated that the proportion of cells in the S stage was increased, and decreased in the G2/M phase. Our study indicates that cyclin G1, as a negative regulator of the cell cycle, plays an important role in the process of decidualization in mouse uterine stromal cells by inhibiting cell-cycle progression.


MicroRNA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fasoulakis Zacharias ◽  
Daskalakis George ◽  
Diakosavvas Michail ◽  
Papapanagiotou Ioannis ◽  
Theodora Marianna ◽  
...  

Aim:: To provide a review considering microRNAs regulating oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes during the different stages of cell cycle, controlling carcinogenesis. Methods:: The role of microRNAs involved as oncogenes’ and tumor suppressor genes’ regulators in cancer was searched in the relevant available literature in MEDLINE, including terms such as “microRNA”, “oncogenes”, “tumor suppressor genes”, “metastasis”, “cancer” and others. Results:: MicroRNAs determine the expression levels of multiple cell cycle regulators, such as cyclins, cyclin dependent kinases and other major cell cycle activators including retinoblastoma 1 (RB- 1) and p53, resulting in alteration and promotion/inhibition of the cell cycle. Conclusion:: MicroRNAs are proven to have a key role in cancer pathophysiology by altering the expression profile of different regulator proteins during cell division cycle and DNA replication. Thus, by acting as oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes, they can either promote or inhibit cancer development and formation, revealing their innovative role as biomarkers and therapeutic tools.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2052-2052
Author(s):  
Luke F. Peterson ◽  
Ming Yan ◽  
Anita Boyapati ◽  
Dong-Er Zhang

Abstract The fusion protein AML1-ETO created by the 8;21 translocation involved in de novo acute myeloid leukemia requires secondary mutational events to promote leukemia. Here, we report that the loss of the molecular events associated with AML1-ETO C-terminus including an NCoR/SMRT interacting domain transforms AML1-ETO into a potent leukemogenic protein in mice. Furthermore, we present evidence of aberrant protein expression of cell cycle regulators in a hematopoietic cell line expressing AML1-ETO compared to the leukemogenic truncated form of AML1-ETO (AML1-ETOtr). Our studies show that AML1-ETO and AML1-ETOtr are biochemically isolated from the same cellular compartments, that they can oligomerize, and that they can both efficiently immunoprecipitate the transcription factor Gfi-1. However, contrary to AML1-ETO, AML1-ETOtr does not promote growth arrest. Western analyses show that cell cycle promoting factors cyclin D3 and cyclin A are decreased by AML1-ETO, while their RNA levels remain the same. In addition, an increase in the cdk-inhibitor p21WAF1 is observed in the presence of both proteins, while only AML1-ETO induces high expression of the cdk-inhibitor p27KIP1. These changes are associated with a deregulation of the SCF ubiquitin E3 ligase component Skp2 that is involved in controlling the levels of both cyclins and cdk-inhibitors. These observations suggest that AML1-ETO has tumor suppressor activity. Additional mutations to bypass this effect can change it into an oncogenic protein. Therefore, our results lead to a new model of AML1-ETO in leukemogenesis, i.e., the gain/loss of function of cell cycle regulators to promote cell cycle progression or disruption of molecular events associated with AML1-ETO C-terminal NCoR/SMRT interacting domain are required for AML1-ETO involved leukemogenesis. The disrupted molecular events may include 1) the loss of factor(s) physically interacting with the C-terminal domain of AML1-ETO, 2) the alteration by mutagenesis of signaling pathways downstream of AML1-ETO C-terminal domain, and 3) the dysfunction within AML1-ETO C-terminal domain by truncations or mutations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (52) ◽  
pp. E12453-E12462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clara Bourbousse ◽  
Neeraja Vegesna ◽  
Julie A. Law

To combat DNA damage, organisms mount a DNA damage response (DDR) that results in cell cycle regulation, DNA repair and, in severe cases, cell death. Underscoring the importance of gene regulation in this response, studies in Arabidopsis have demonstrated that all of the aforementioned processes rely on SUPPRESSOR OF GAMMA RESPONSE 1 (SOG1), a NAC family transcription factor (TF) that has been functionally equated to the mammalian tumor suppressor, p53. However, the expression networks connecting SOG1 to these processes remain largely unknown and, although the DDR spans from minutes to hours, most transcriptomic data correspond to single time-point snapshots. Here, we generated transcriptional models of the DDR from GAMMA (γ)-irradiated wild-type and sog1 seedlings during a 24-hour time course using DREM, the Dynamic Regulatory Events Miner, revealing 11 coexpressed gene groups with distinct biological functions and cis-regulatory features. Within these networks, additional chromatin immunoprecipitation and transcriptomic experiments revealed that SOG1 is the major activator, directly targeting the most strongly up-regulated genes, including TFs, repair factors, and early cell cycle regulators, while three MYB3R TFs are the major repressors, specifically targeting the most strongly down-regulated genes, which mainly correspond to G2/M cell cycle-regulated genes. Together these models reveal the temporal dynamics of the transcriptional events triggered by γ-irradiation and connects these events to TFs and biological processes over a time scale commensurate with key processes coordinated in response to DNA damage, greatly expanding our understanding of the DDR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document